Foreign Policy
America First, as I define it, begins by acknowledging and prioritizing our national interests. This principle is not incompatible with, but rather is strengthened by, our historical commitment to human rights and self-determination, a commitment we have actively promoted since World War II. President George Washington's guidance remains relevant: all international decisions must be carefully balanced against the best interests of the United States.
In the first two months of the previous presidential administration, actions were taken that strained relationships with our historic allies, imposed tariffs on close trading partners, and proposed solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that lacked nuance and potentially exacerbated tensions. Additionally, relationships were fostered with nations engaged in actions contrary to our values.
While I firmly support Israel's right to exist and defend itself, I cannot endorse the continued transfer of weapons when there is evidence of their disproportionate use against civilian populations. I will advocate for a reassessment of arms transfers to Israel, conditioned on a demonstrable commitment to minimizing civilian casualties and pursuing a path towards a lasting peace.
Since World War II, the United States has stood against aggression and in support of self-determination. We must continue to support Ukraine in its defense against Russian invasion. This support aligns with our national interest in upholding international law and defending democratic principles. I will advocate for the continued provision of military and intelligence resources to Ukraine, contingent on their responsible use and commitment to democratic governance, until Russia withdraws from all illegally occupied Ukrainian territory, including Crimea.
I remain skeptical of nation-building endeavors. The people of any nation must lead their own path to self-determination. However, if a nation seeks our support, I will advocate for rigorous due diligence. This will include verifying the soundness of their plans, the integrity of their leaders, and the alignment of their goals with our national ethos, before any assistance is considered.
Finally, the United States must confront its inconsistent record regarding human rights in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our post-World War II pledge to prevent atrocities like the Holocaust has too often been unfulfilled in this region. We must either commit to proactive and meaningful engagement to protect vulnerable populations or acknowledge that our rhetoric on human rights is selectively applied. To achieve this, I will advocate for a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes diplomatic solutions, economic development, and targeted humanitarian assistance, while also holding accountable those who perpetrate human rights abuses. This strategy will be designed to align with the national interest of the United States, and to promote stability in the region.
In all our foreign policy actions, we must remember the wisdom of President Washington: prioritize our national interest, uphold our values, and act with prudence and foresight.